Publications

Jan Kleinheisterkamp (selection)

  • ‘A World Without Investment Arbitration? An Introduction for Debate’
    in: C. Bull, L. Malintoppi, C. Partasides (eds.), ICCA 2022: Arbitration’s Age of Enlightenment? (ICCA Congress Series No. 21, Kluwer 2023) 903-906
  • ‘The Myth of Transnational Public Policy’
    (2023) 71(1) American Journal of Comparative Law 98-141
  • ‘Development of Comparative Law in Latin America’
    in: M. Reimann / R. Zimmermann (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd edn., OUP 2019) 253-287
  • ‘The UK Supreme Court and International Commercial Arbitration’
    (with S. Upadhyay)
    [2019-2] b-Arbitra – Belgian Review of Arbitration 501-522
  • ‘Overriding Mandatory Laws in International Arbitration’
    (2018) 67(4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 903-930
  • ‘Mehr Freiheit wagen mit Menschenrechten – Ein Versuch zur Rechtssicherheit durch Investitionsschutzrecht’
    in: A. Dutta / C. Heinze (eds.), Mehr Freiheit wagen – Beiträge zur Emiritierung von Jürgen Basedow (Mohr Siebeck 2018) 173-193
  • ‘Critically Thinking International Arbitration in Context’
    in: S. Brekoulakis / J. Lew / L. Mistelis (eds), The Evolution and Future of International Arbitration (Kluwer 2016) 401-406
  • ‘Investment Protection in TTIP: Three Feasible Proposals’
    (with L. Poulsen)
    in: M. Bungenberg et al (eds.), (2016) 7 European Yearbook of International Economic Law 527-541
  • ‘Investment Treaty Law and the Fear for Sovereignty: Transnational Challenges and Solutions’
    (2015) 78(5) Modern Law Review 793-825
  • ‘Financial Responsibility in the European International Investment Policy’
    (2014) 63(2) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 449-476
  • ‘A Dispute Capable of Settlement by Arbitration or Arbitrators Capable of Settling a Dispute?’
    [2013-3] Cahiers de l’arbitrage / Paris Journal of International Arbitration 595-607
  • ‘Arbitraje comercial internacional en el Reino Unido’
    in: J.L Collantes González & Anne-Carole Cremades (eds.), Arbitraje comercial internacional en Europa: aspectos actuales y regímenes jurídicos (Lima 2013) 1015-1044
  • ‘European Policy Space in International Investment Law’
    (2012) 27(2) ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 416-431
  • ‘Investment Protection and EU Law: The ECT between Extra- and Intra-EU BITs’
    (2012) 15(1) Journal of International Economic Law 85-109
  • ‘Lord Mustill in the Courts of Tennis: Dallah v Pakistan in England, France and Utopia’
    (2012) 75(4) Modern Law Review 639-654
  • ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards’
    ‘Influence of European Private Law on Latin America’
    ‘UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts’
    in: J. Basedow / K. Hopt / R. Zimmermann (eds.), Encyclopedia of European Private Law (OUP 2012)
  • ‘Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’
    in: R. Wolfrum (ed.), Max-Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2nd edn., OUP 2012) 664-672
  • ‘Les sanctions pour inexécution du contrat dans les Principes UNIDROIT’
    in: G. Keutgen (ed.), Les Principes UNIDROIT relatifs aux contrats de commerce international et l’arbitrage (Bruylant 2011) 125-143
  • ‘The Review of Arbitrator’s Interpretation of International Contracts – Transnational Law as a Dangerous Short-Cut: Note regarding Swiss Federal Supreme Court Decision 4A_240/2009’
    (2011) 29 ASA Bulletin 474-486
  • ‘The Future of the BITs of the European Member States after Lisbon’
    (2011) 29 ASA Bulletin 212-223
  • ‘Part II – The Draft Regulation on Transitional Arrangements’
    in: S. Woolcock (ed.), The EU Approach to International Investment Policy after the Lisbon Treaty 53-70
(European Parliament INTA Study 2010)
  • ‘National Report for the United States – Commercial Arbitration’
    (with Joel Samuels)
    in: J. Sánchez Córdero (ed.), The Impact of Uniform Law on National Law: Limits and Possibilities (Mexico City 2010) 129-171
  • ‘The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements’
    (2009) 3(2) World Arbitration and Mediation Review 91-120
  • ‘Eingriffsnormen und Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit: Ein praktischer Versuch‘
    (2009) 73 Rabels Zeitschrift für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht 818-841
  • ‘Interdependência entre os Procedimentos de Anulação e de Execução (II): Proposta de reforma da Lei de Arbitragem’
    (2009) 20 Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 92-98
  • Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts
    (with S. Vogenauer), 1st edn, Oxford: OUP 2008 (ccxxix, 1319 pages)
  • ‘The UN Security Council’s Incapacity of Coping with Conflict-Related Economic Interests’
    (2006) 37 Transnational Legal Policy 108-123
  • ‘Medidas cautelares en el arbitraje – Una perspectiva comparatista’
    in: D. Fernández A. / R. Herbert (eds.), Liber Amicorum en homenaje al Profesor Dr. Didier Opertti Badán (Montevideo: FCU 2006) 269-287
  • International Commercial Arbitration in Latin America – Regulation and Practice in the MERCOSUR and the Associated Countries
    Dobbs Ferry: Oceana / Oxford: OUP (2005) (xxx, 691 pages)
  • ‘Interdependência entre os Processos de Anulação e de Execução’
    (2004) 1 Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 96-104
  • ‘O Brasil e as disputas com investidores estrangeiros’
    in: R. Di Sena Jr. / M.T. Costa Souza Cherem (eds.), Comércio Internacional e Desenvolvimento – Uma Perspectiva Brasileira (São Paulo: Saraiva 2004) 156-187
  • ‘A interpretação uniforme do direito comunitário – Um ensaio prático sobre a metodologia do direito do MERCOSUL’
    in: J. Grandino Rodas (ed.), Contratos Internacionais (São Paulo: RT 2002) 331-367
  • ‘Conflict of Treaties on International Arbitration in the Southern Cone’
    in: J. Kleinheisterkamp/G. Lorenzo (eds.), Avances del Derecho Internacional Privado – Liber Amicorum Jürgen Samtleben (Montevideo, FCU 2002) 667-700

Carolina Pitta e Cunha

  • Imediação e videoconferência no processo civil: muito barulho por nada? Reflexão à luz de uma dupla justificação de imediação
    Julgar Online (August 2022) (html)
  • ‘Arbitration in Portugal Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic’
    (2020) XIV Revista Internacional de Arbitragem e Conciliação 189-209
  • Tutela cautelar’
    in: Monteiro Pires / R. Pereira Dias (eds.), 1 Manual de Arbitragem Internacional Lusófona (Almedina 2020) 301-364
  • ‘The Impact of the Novel Coronavirus in Arbitration: Barrier or Opportunity?’ (with Isabel Rebello de Andrade)
    Lisbon Arbitration (7 May 2020) (html)
  • ‘Brexit: incerteza também em matéria de resolução de litígios internacionais’
    ECO (Sapo.pt) (11 April 2019) (html)
  • ‘Entry Into Force of the Updated Version of the Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the Conduct of Arbitration Pursuant to the ICC Rules of Arbitration’
    Lisbon Arbitration (16 January 2019) (html)
  • ‘The Achmea Ruling: Remaining Doubts’
    Lisbon Arbitration (4 September 2018) (html)
  • ‘A morte anunciada dos tratados de investimento intracomunitários’ (with Filipe Vaz Pinto)
    Expresso (17 February 2018)
  • The ICC Expedited Rules: increasing speed and cost-efficiency in ICC arbitrations’
    (2017) 26 YAR – Young Arbitration Review 20-26
  • ‘Arbitrators and courts compared: the long path towards an arbitrators’ duty to apply internationally mandatory rules’
    (2016) 21 YAR – Young Arbitration Review 26-38

Shaurya Upadhyay

  • Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration’
    Jus Mundi WikiNotes (2022) (html)
  • ‘The UK Supreme Court and International Commercial Arbitration’
    (with J. Kleinheisterkamp)
    [2019-2] b-ArbitraBelgian Review of Arbitration 501-522
  • ‘To Extend or not to Extend – The Indian Approach to Extension of Arbitration Agreements to Non-Signatories’
    (Jan-Mar 2019) 200 ICA Arbitration Quarterly 18-36 (pdf)
  • ‘The Internet Ever Forgets? – Locating the “Right to be Forgotten” Within the Indian Constitutional and Legal Framework’
    (with Shreeyash Uday Lalit)
    (2016-2017) 5 Delhi Law Review (Student Edition) 72-103 (pdf)
  • ‘The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 – Critical Perspectives’
    (2015) 3 CLC Student Law Review 94